Native Document Production
Confused about producing native files? Not sure whether you’re adhering to the Federal Rules? TLC can help you choose the optimal, most cost-effective solution for your document production.
To TIFF or not to TIFF?
A standard production of TIFF images generated from native files includes images, extracted text, and metadata information.
Why convert to TIFF for production?
Creates static version of the document collection.
Enables page-level Bates numbering.
Allows you to redact documents.
Gives you control of text and metadata information.
Why would you choose a different production format?
TIFF conversion is typically the most expensive option.
TIFF conversion takes more time than a native file production.
Your opponent may object to this type of production.
Producing in Native Format
For email, there are three common native production options:
Produce email in its original format (typically Microsoft Outlook PST files or Lotus Notes NSF files).
Produce emails as individual messages with the attachments embedded (Microsoft Outlook msg files).
Produce email messages in html format and provide attachments in their native format as stand-alone files.
There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these approaches, but the primary reasons for choosing a native production are:
It costs less and is typically quicker to create than TIFF conversion.
You are providing the documents in their original format so there is less opportunity for your opponent to object to it.
You may be required to by the court or by agreement with opposing counsel.
The disadvantages of this approach include:
No page level control, so pages cannot be numbered or redacted.
Limited control over production of metadata and text of native files.
Difficult to authenticate documents in filings, depositions, or court proceedings.